By: msanon

In reply to Chandra.

that’s the thing about structural -isms, there’s always a perfectly logical reason why disenfranchised folks get shafted that won’t be any one person/entity’s fault per se, but the privileged ‘just so happen’ to keep benefiting, and those outside of the franchise ‘get consequences they could have avoided if they just xxx’. it’s an oxymoron of vague precision that keeps things unequal because fairness is often subjectively understood as beneficial with the cover of impartial.